Monday, April 19, 2021

26. The Gold In These Hills


The Gold In These Hills. Joanne Bischof. 2021. [August] 336 pages. [Source: Review copy]

First sentence: It’s paramount that my daughter and I survive the coming winter, yet ghost towns are not for the living. Still, this desolate place with its remaining miners and abandoned buildings is home.

The Gold In These Hills is two stories in one--for better or worse. One story--narrated by Juniper Cohen--is set in Kenworthy, California, in 1902/1903. The second story--narrated by Johnny Sutherland--is set in the same location just in modern times. The stories alternate. 

Juniper's husband has gone missing--presumed dead by some. Without John by her side, Juniper is struggling to raise their daughter, Bethany. The two live in the outskirts of a ghost town--all but a resilient, stubborn few--have left for greener pastures--so to speak. The promised gold mine with wealth and riches a fabricated lie. She gives it her all, and at night she pours it all out on paper--Dearest John. 

Johnny Sutherland has struggles of his own. Partly to work through his struggles, partly because it is awesome, he has just bought a major fixer-upper. The only remaining homestead from the town that was Kenworthy. It has been a museum for ages--decades--but now it is his. It comes with a story waiting to be unpacked and discovered. 

I found The Gold In These Hills to be a compelling read. It was an intense read with plenty of feels. I loved, loved, loved, loved Juniper's story. I loved Johnny's story too. (Though I found it a bit more problematic.)

I thought it was beautifully--artistically--written. This was a crafted novel. There was nothing fluffy or insubstantial about it. It was well done. The characters were fleshed out as well; they were oh-so-human. This goes for both story lines. But I personally felt the historical story was the stronger of the two. 

If I could change anything about this novel, it would be the tacked-on-romance for the contemporary story. Some readers may not feel it was tacked on. Some may genuinely think the romance was organic and natural to this particular story. But not me. Nope. I felt the whole character and their inferred upcoming romance was just an add on. One that I didn't need. Not every Christian fiction needs to have a romantic element. 

I liked the contemporary story best when it was focused on Johnny--his struggles, his family, his hopes, his dreams, his frustrations, his disappointments. I liked it least when it was straining to connect the dots between the two stories and force them together. 

That being said, it is one of the most literary books I've read in the Christian fiction genre in quite a while. I have to say the writing was excellent.

Quotes:
  • Now the mine is quiet, and hope is as dusty as everything else. All we hear is come nightfall when all the abandoned dogs that have turned wild howl at the moon. That is Kenworthy now.
  • I married a stranger once. It could be done again.
  • I feel ashamed to love him. I feel more ashamed to hate him. And so it is upon the closing of each day that I settle at the upstairs desk beneath the window and write the two words that somehow keep me from coming apart at the seams.
  • The harsh truth about a ghost town is that you’re not supposed to still live here. The few who remain? We are the forgotten.
  • If she only knew that I would give up a thousand hellos from a thousand men for the chance to see John once more. But she doesn’t know this because I’ve kept the longing pinned deep inside. Like a hidden pocket that I let no one see into. Perhaps it is pride—the burning need for me to be strong. Not fragile or weak. Perhaps it is because I scarcely acknowledge that place myself. Only when I am alone, and can cry freely, do I concede how much my heart still beats for a man who is lost to me.
  • There’s really nothing else to do but stand boot to boot with grief. In most slot canyons, there are spots that are so tight they only get a few minutes of sunlight each day. We call these narrows. Is this what I’m facing now? The narrows? It’s hard to see the sun here. Nearly impossible to feel the light. But one thing I’ve learned in all my years of canyoneering is that you have to keep moving . . . and the scenery will change. It’s the narrows that make you braver. Stronger. It’s the narrows that change you.
  • Her sweetness brings me life. Even though my heart is broken, God is showing me how to bind it up tight in grace and press onward. Hope remains fractured. That which I held onto for John is like ash, and I do not know how to revive it. I do not believe I should try. But for Bethany and me? Hope must bloom and blossom.
  • Walking has been my salvation of late. A way to move forward in body even if all else lingers at a standstill.
  • They’ve pulled off their hats, standing as centennials, a respect that people say doesn’t exist in the West between the white and those who lived here a thousand years before. Yet it exists this day, and I am only sorry it has taken the loss of an infant’s life to spark such unity. I pray it is a legacy that will linger on. They say there is no gold in these hills. But as a father lays dirt over a wooden box, there suddenly is. She’s the most precious thing that this stretch of mountain has ever had the honor to hold.
  • Edie walks in an agony all her own, and yet words of hope are rising from her heart. It is a heart that has been forged in gold. It is the gold that dwells here in Kenworthy. Perhaps the mine has always been empty, but we have a fortune that cannot be dug from the soil. Instead, it is in the lessons we have learned, the people we’ve come to love, and the way our faith grows in the desert and deep in the mountains. That is the gold that dwells in these hills, and it is an honor for Edie and me to have witnessed its glory.

© Becky Laney of Operation Actually Read Bible

25. Why Social Justice is Not Biblical Justice


Why Social Justice is Not Biblical Justice: An Urgent Appeal to Fellow Christians in a Time of Social Crisis.  Scott David Allen. 2020. [September] 205 pages. [Source: Bought]

First sentence: In recent years, a powerful ideology has made deep inroads into the very heart of the evangelical church. To its mainstream advocates, it is called “social justice” and is nearly always coupled with a commitment to equality, diversity, and inclusion.

There are probably dozens--if not hundreds--of reviews that will do this book on justice actual justice. Reviews that may break down the book chapter by chapter and analyze its contents and provide readers with clues as to whether this is the book for them--or not.

The premise of this one is simple: justice has been coupled--for better or worse--with social justice. Coupled by people without the church (outside the church) certainly, but also coupled by people within the church. Social justice is eclipsing biblical justice. People looking for justice are turning not to God, not to the church, not to the powers that be, but to society, to specific sections of society. 

The truth of the matter is that ANY definition of justice that discounts, discredits, ignores, belittles, twists, or distorts God's definition of justice is wrong. Plain and simple. God is Just. God is Righteous. God is Good. God is Wise. God is Omniscient, Omnipotent, Omnipresent. (In other words, all-seeing and all-knowing. He doesn't just know the outside actions--but the inward thoughts.) God is also the ULTIMATE (final) Judge. 

For Christians--those who profess to be Christians--to give more authority or credit to outside theories or world views when it comes to justice--or when it comes to anything really--is just all kinds of wrong. For example, Critical Race Theory, or CRT. CRT should not be used as a tool to reinterpret or "interpret" Scripture. (Neither should feminism or intersectionality). 

This book isn't written to persuade unbelievers--those outside the Christian faith--of the dangers of jumping on the social justice bandwagon. It is written primarily for those who profess to be Christ-followers (aka Christians, believers) to think biblically and with discernment about injustices in society. In other words, let the Word of God reign authoritatively in their lives--yes, even when it comes to living real life in a messy, messy super-fallen, soul-bruising world filled with tears, pain, and anguish. 

The truth is the Bible has a lot to say both in the Old Testament and New Testament about injustice and justice, about sin and righteousness, about right and wrong, about good and evil. The Bible gives us guidelines and principles, certainly, but it also gives us promises upon which we can base our hope. 

The book could have just focused on biblical justice--how the Bible treats the subject or doctrine of justice--but it also chooses to engage directly with the competition. It is all about comparing and contrasting the two: biblical justice AND social justice. It looks at them both from plenty of angles. It presents the flaws of social justice that Christians should be aware of before they open up their hearts and minds and embrace social justice. 

I would say one of the most important things is to be aware that even though both groups use some of the same words, the two groups mean very different things by those words. So though on the surface the two groups may appear to have much in common--a common goal that is of utmost important--there are major differences in play. People can with completely good intentions fall for it. Especially if they are more tuned into the news--TV, internet, radio--than the Word of God. 

The author does mention--and readers will already be aware--that both sides tend to resort (not even as a  last resort) to name calling and label-throwing. This isn't a kind, friendly debate--an exchange of ideas--but all out war. 

So the book is about dangers from the world, to a certain degree, but also about dangers within the church. It is the dangers within the church--coming from within--that prove costliest and feel like a betrayal. The Bible-believing Christian faces warfare from within and without--the church and the world. 

There isn't a quick solution. It isn't as easy as saying, well, we'll just skip this hot topic altogether and focus on the essentials. No, the author urges justice--BIBLICAL JUSTICE, justice on God's terms--is essential to a right practice of the faith. What we need is preaching and teaching on biblical justice. 

I definitely loved some of the chapters. I did. I found almost all of the chapters thought provoking. 

If I could change one thing about the book, however, it would be his historical discussion of Republicans and Democrats. I think he has perhaps intentionally left this vague and confusing. Instead of pointing out the labels "Democrat" and "Republican" have changed, transformed, evolved through the past hundred plus years, he acts as if they are still the same. For example, he goes on about how it was Democrats that were racists, that were pro-slavery, that were pushing all these racists laws, that founded the KKK, and that it was always Republicans who were the good guys, who stood in opposition to the hateful, despicable Democrats. If you are at all familiar with history, you know that you can't do that. Or perhaps you shouldn't do that. If you were to go back in time, what passes today for "Republican" and "Democrat" today would be unrecognizable and completely foreign. Policies, ideologies, beliefs, practices morph and change. The issues we argue and debate today would be completely foreign if not horrendously shocking to the past. And that's not because we're "better" people. The truth is the past would shock us and our values just as much as our "values" would shock the past. It works both ways. Anyway, to sum it up, the paragraphs were the author explores this argument weaken his argument--in my opinion. 

I did appreciate his argument not to conform to the world, not to accept the world's world views as your own, to cling to the Word of God, to fight the good fight, to live rightly by God's standards, to be the salt and light, the city on the hill. 
 

© Becky Laney of Operation Actually Read Bible

Friday, April 16, 2021

24. My Dear Miss Dupre


My Dear Miss Dupré. Grace Hitchcock. 2021. [March] 364 pages. [Source: Review copy]

First sentence: Willow Dupré twirled on the ice, spreading her arms and guiding her body around the other skaters on the frozen lake of Central Park.

My Dear Miss Dupré has a love it or hate it premise. Willow Dupré, our heroine, finds herself the center of attention due to her parents' unusual arrangement for finding her a husband. They have arranged for THIRTY ELIGIBLE bachelors (from New York) to all court their lovely daughter at once. She'll be handing out LAUREL CROWNS and asking the bachelors if they accept the crowns ever so often. There will be individual dates and group dates. Instead of a bachelor mansion, the men will be staying with the family in their mansion. All the men under the same roof with her. At one point, halfway through the competition, they even add a travel/vacation plot. 

What I didn't point out just yet is that this book is set in 1882 in New York City. 

No doubt about it, My Dear Miss Dupré is a premise-driven novel. It checks off ALL the things you'd expect from any and every season of the Bachelor or Bachelorette. Well, almost. Considering that this is Christian fiction and HISTORICAL fiction, we're spared a fantasy suite depiction. 

It is an odd little book to be sure. It is clearly derivative of The Bachelorette. The twist is that it's set in the past. But it doesn't really vary off from that pattern, that predictability of The Bachelorette. The odd-ness comes in the balancing of modern-day Bachelorette vibes and the values and morals of the nineteenth century. It's a tricky balance. For example, should Willow be giving away kisses to multiple suitors. She says yes. Her mother (and best friend) say NO, NO, NO. And for being set during this time period, there sure is a lot of freedom and independence when it comes to chaperones/chaperoning. 

But what really makes it odd is that this forcing of the historical lens on the process (Bachelor Nation) makes for a thought-provoking read. There's this struggle between pride and shame, arrogance and humility. For example, the bachelors, the male contestants if you will, there's this internal struggle of IS THIS THE MOST HUMILIATING THING IN THE WORLD???? Why am I allowing myself to be put in this situation where I am groveling for attention, acceptance, etc??? Why am I letting my ego take so many punches??? Why do I care so much for this one woman??? How did I get dragged into this mess??? There's pride each time a laurel is offered--to a certain degree. But it's a condescending type of pride even then. 

Willow struggles as well. She didn't ask for this. But she didn't refuse either. She goes along--no matter how silly or ridiculous. And most of the time it's a big ego-boost. She loves the flattery, the attention, the me-ness of it all even while she's questioning the motives of some of the contestants. She is really having the time of her life. It isn't all easy, however. 

One way to read the novel is as a parody of The Bachelorette. 

One example of the melodrama: 
Willow’s jaw dropped. Whatever is he upset about now? “Mr. Seaborne. You forget yourself.” Cullen tilted his head, his brows lowering to a point as he set aside his cup and reached for Willow’s. “And why am I a cad?” Mr. Seaborne gestured to where they sat, the vein in his head becoming more prevalent. “You robbed me of my special moment with Miss Dupré.” Willow’s stomach dropped, the lingering taste of chocolate turning bitter. The Fae? Oh, Cullen. “Oscar, you planned this?” She lifted the nosegay and gestured to the set behind her. “Of course I did. I gathered those blooms myself and had the servants prepare the rest.” Cullen groaned. “My apologies, chap. I did not know.” His nostrils flared. “How could you not know that it wasn’t meant for your use? Who do you think would have set up such an interlude?” Willow stood, unwilling to allow his jealous wrath to fall solely on Cullen’s shoulders, broad as they were. “I am so sorry, Mr. Seaborne. I should have realized—” He lifted his splayed fingers. “You were not to know, miss. But, Dempsey, you have no such excuse. I just told you that I had something special planned.”


Friday, April 9, 2021

23. Castle of Refuge


Castle of Refuge (The Dericott Tales #2) Melanie Dickerson. 2021. [June] 336 pages. [Source: Review copy]

First sentence: Audrey hid behind a tree and watched a knight and his squire riding down the lane. 

Melanie Dickerson's newest historical romance is a 'retelling' of The Ugly Duckling. Audrey, our heroine, has believed herself to be ugly--because of her sister's cruel words--most of her life. Even more so after her sister (totally on purpose) "accidentally" pushes her face first into a fire. (I'm assuming fire place). Fortunately, it was just her ear/neck that was burned/scarred. So she can 'hide' her damaged face relatively easily--especially if she remains pulled back--out of sight--from society. If up to Audrey, perhaps, she'd never have left her home. But Maris, her cruel older sister, is returning from the convent, and Audrey, well, she's afraid for her life, afraid that her father cannot--will not--protect her. 

So Audrey runs away...she finds refuge...in...you guessed it... a castle. But not just any castle, the castle of Lord (Edwin) Dericott. (The two had met oh-so-briefly in the prologue.) Readers first met Edwin in Court of Swans. 

Will she finally be safe at last? 

Looking just on the surface, you would think this book HAD to be a perfect match for me. Set in England in the Middle Ages (prologue 1378, rest of the novel 1382). A retelling of a fairy tale. Not just any fairy tale but The Ugly Duckling. A romance. How could it ever go wrong?

But. I didn't like it. I really didn't like it. I'll do my best to explain why. But I'm going to throw out a spoiler warning so I can talk freely.

S
P
O
I
L
E
R

W
A
R
N
I
N
G

You've been warned now. I can relax my guard a bit with details. 

I think the retelling is not set in the *right* time period. Dickerson's details on what life was like in the middle ages seems incredibly iffy at best. If it was say set anytime after 1611--or even after 1500--I would probably not worry about specifics. Two things stand out to me. One, Audrey (like Delia in book one) is a daughter of a nobleman. She can read. She can write. She knows two to three foreign languages. (French, German, and presumably Latin?). Her education is not seen as out of the ordinary or uncommon. She starts a SCHOOL for girls--all backgrounds and classes including peasants. She stresses the importance of knowing how to read and write. All well and good. But I *don't* think education--public education--was that common, widespread, in particular when it comes to lower classes, in particular when it comes to girls and young women. I think education while not unheard of for some classes--the upper classes, the nobility, etc.--I don't think it was all that common for the rest of folks. Two, owning Scripture is taken for granted. Lord Dericott even has MULTIPLE COPIES of the Bible. IN 1382. Before the printing press. At a time when each copy would have been handwritten or copied out by a scribe. At a time when personal ownership of Scriptures would have been extremely expensive and probably not all that common. Perhaps the nobility did have enough money to have a copy of Scripture. Perhaps like Lord Dericott, they would have had a LARGE library with plenty of books--hundreds, thousands, etc. Then there's the fact that the Bible is in English. The first complete Bible--Old Testament and New Testament--had not been completed in English in 1382. From everything I've read--that's what I conclude. Psalms would have been translated into English earlier. Probably some of the gospels maybe even all the gospels. But the whole Bible had not yet been translated into English...another decade yes. But Dickerson is also not considering that AT THE TIME the English translations--by the Lollards--was seen as dangerous, illegal, frowned upon. Audrey wants to TEACH her students (all girls, all classes) to read using the Gospel of Luke. She wants Edwin to HIRE SCRIBES to copy out a copy for her students. You know, as you do. No biggie. Piece of cake, right. It couldn't possibly cost a lot of money or take a lot of time.

But let's say I can forgive and forget all that. I would still find the lack of inner motivations and flat characterizations a bit annoying. I know it is asking a lot of any writer/creator to flesh out the villain and make them have motivations that make sense. Readers are given a simplistic--too simplistic--explanation for THE VILLAINY VILLAIN. She's very one-note. Maris, the villain, is SUPER EVIL AND DEMENTED because she was physically abused as a toddler (think before the age of 3) by a nurse maid. Decades worth of being with her family after the nursemaid was dismissed hasn't erased her trauma. She's been allowed to verbally, mentally, psychologically, physically abuse anyone in all those years just because. Because her father feels guilty and ashamed he didn't know it was happening. Because her sister pities her. She has a whole household living in FEAR for at least two decades. Everyone says, well, it must be okay because she was abused and there you have it. That's why it's okay for her to act like this. Nothing I can do to make this situation better. Not gonna try. Not gonna intervene. Not going to parent. 

One of my pet peeves in romance is KIDNAPPING. I usually find melodrama highly annoying and problematic. Audrey doesn't get kidnapped once or twice or even three times. She gets kidnapped by her evil sister and her GIANT COMPANION with the regularity that some people blow their noses. Okay, I exaggerate. Still. It happens way too frequently in this novel. 

The characterizations are weak, in my opinion, and the plot ridiculous. 





© Becky Laney of Operation Actually Read Bible

Tuesday, April 6, 2021

3. New American Standard Giant Print Reference Bible


New American Standard Bible: Giant Print Reference Bible. God. 2004/1995. Foundation Publications. 2000 pages. [Best guess on page numbers] Source: Gift. 

First sentence: In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.

I first read the NASB Giant Print Reference Bible in 2016. I can't find proof on my blog or GoodReads. But I *know* I finished it cover to cover. 

The NASB is one of my favorite, favorite, favorite translations.

I decided to use the Giant Print edition of the NASB to experiment with the Professor Horner Bible Reading plan in 2021. Today, April 6, 2021, I finished reading this Bible cover to cover. Now, some books of the Bible I've read three times. Some twice. Some once. I'll include photos below to share my madness.

  • I love the size of the giant print. It is 14 point font. 
  • It is double column. I am neither single column only or double column only. I think their are pros and cons to both. I think a giant print single column Bible would be bulkier, for sure!
  • It is red letter. I wish I could live in a world that was black letter only. But since that isn't possible, I'm glad that the font size was large enough and the red dark enough that it wasn't too bothersome.
  • I honestly don't know why this is advertised as a reference Bible. There are a few references (a couple) at the end of some paragraphs. There are no references in the center column, the side, or the bottom. For a so-called "reference" Bible there are very few references. (I personally don't care about the references, I am here ONLY for the giant print.)
  • The book introductions are in the back of the Bible. I would NEVER EVER EVER have thought of looking for them there! It wasn't until I read the product description on Christianbook.com that I realized this one even had book introductions.
  • There is a concordance--a little over a hundred pages of a concordance.
  • There are maps. (I don't care about maps personally).
  • There are a few family pages. (Again, not what I personally look for in a Bible, but they're there all the same.)
  • There is ONE lone ribbon marker.
My biggest complaint with this one is the GHOSTING of the pages. Ideally the only ghost in the Bible is the HOLY GHOST. Unfortunately, the paper is so thin that one could read two perhaps three pages of text at a time. I really wish that bleed through wasn't an issue for any Bible. It seems that it's impossible almost to escape. Publishers can try to line match. Publishers can use thicker paper. Readers can get creative with black construction paper. But it's never really an issue of IF a Bible is going to have ghosting, but HOW BAD the ghosting is. 




These first four pictures show the record-keeping process. Each chapter of the Bible. Circle means finished once. I then used slashes (right and left) to indicate second and third readings. A few have a straight up-and-down slash that indicate a fourth reading. But there are no books of the Bible that I completely read through four times. 


These three pictures show whole completed readings. 


© Becky Laney of Operation Actually Read Bible

Thursday, April 1, 2021

22. Court of Swans


Court of Swans (The Dericott Tales #1) Melanie Dickerson. 2021. [January] 328 pages. [Source: Review copy]

First sentence: Delia’s stomach felt sick as she watched her father marry Parnella, a woman whom she had met only two times. 

Court of Swans is a historical novel set in England largely taking place in 1381 during the reign of Richard II. (The prologue is set in the summer of 1378). It is a retelling of fairy tale The Wild Swans. Delia, our heroine, is forced to save her seven brothers after they are cruelly accused of murder and treason and imprisoned in the Tower of London. 

That is the short description. It doesn't really tell you how I feel about the characters, the writing, the PACE.

I found Court of Swans to be an INTENSE, fast-paced, emotional read. I loved getting to know Delia and her seven brothers: Edwin, Gerard, Berenger, Merek, Charles, David, and Roland. I loved their devotion and loyalty to one another. They love each other fiercely and tenderly. 

I loved the romantic element. I also loved that it wasn't quite front and center. Delia is all about saving her brothers. As it should be. Her attention isn't split by noticing cute knights. And the romance between Delia and one of the knights, Sir Geoffrey, was well done. It wasn't rushed. It wasn't insta-love. 

I loved the setting. I loved that it was set in England. I loved that it brushes with royalty. It isn't just set in the reign of Richard II, we get glimpses of the royal court. At one point in my life I was trying to read historical fiction set during the reigns of ALL the kings and queens of England. Richard II isn't as well known as some of the other kings. 

If I could change one thing about this historical novel it would be to remove the references to Delia, our main character, OWNING and READING a Bible in an English translation. Mentioning that this Bible belonged to her mother BEFORE she married. 

Part of me understands that a Christian author would want her heroine to be able to quote Scripture word for word and draw great comfort from Scripture. But the other part of me is upset. The first complete translation of the Scriptures into English was done circa 1382 to 1395. The New Testament was completed first perhaps around 1380/1381. But copies would have been BY HAND--not printing press. (And the first Bible printed by the printing press was about 180 copies. This was ) So the idea that even among noble families copies of the Bible in English would have been likely is small, ridiculously small. Unimaginably expensive it would have been to own a Bible at all--and English translations weren't common in 1381. Now for a wealthy noble family, something in Latin I could probably accept. Probably. 

Now according to what I have read, some translations of the Psalms into English was occurring decades earlier. But Delia didn't say she had a copy of the Psalms. 

© Becky Laney of Operation Actually Read Bible

Wednesday, March 31, 2021

March 2021 Reflections


Verses on my heart:
  • Make me know Your ways, O Lord; Teach me Your paths. Psalm 25:4
  • But seek first His kingdom and His righteousness, and all these things will be added to you. Matthew 6:33
  • Sanctify them in the truth; Your word is truth. John 17:17
2021 Bible Reading
  • In March I read Matthew 5-8 thirty times
  • In March I read Psalm 17-26 thirty times
  • In March I finished the 1560 Geneva Bible
  • In March I continued using the ESV app to read the M'Cheyne reading plan
  • In March I continued reading the NASB Giant Print Reference Bible using the Horner system; I completely changed up the ten lists the last week of March. (I wrote a post about it here). 
  • In March I started the 1611 KJV Bible. I've read Genesis through Ruth. 
  • In March I started the KJV (I got a new Bible!!!) I've read Genesis, 1 Chronicles, Matthew, James, 1 and 2 Peter, I believe. 

Books Reviewed at Operation Actually Read Bible

14. Recovering the Lost Art of Reading: a Quest for the True, the Good, and the Beautiful. Leland Ryken and Glenda Faye Mathes. 2021. [March] 304 pages. [Source: Review copy]
15. Trusting God in the Darkness. Christopher Ash. 2021. [April] 160 pages. [Source: Review copy]
16.Christians Get Depressed Too. David Murray. 2010. Reformation Heritage. 112 pages. [Source: Gift]
17. R.C. Sproul: A Lifeby Stephen J. Nichols. 2021. [March] 371 pages. [Source: Review copy]
18. The Amish Quiltmaker's Unexpected Baby (The Amish Quiltmaker #1)Jennifer Beckstrand. 2021. 352 pages. [Source: Review copy]
19. Help Your Kids Learn and Love the Bible. Danika Cooley. 2021. [June] 208 pages. [Source: Review copy]
20. Knowledge of the Holy. A.W. Tozer. 1961/1978. HarperCollins. 128 pages. [Source: Book I Bought]
21. The Screwtape Letters. C.S. Lewis. 1942. 228 pages. [Source: Bought]

Bibles Reviewed at Operation Actually Read Bible
2. Geneva Bible 1560. God. 1560. 4305 pages. [Source: Bought] 
© Becky Laney of Operation Actually Read Bible